<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sustainability Archive &#187; Solids reduction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sustainabilityarchive.com/tag/solids-reduction/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sustainabilityarchive.com</link>
	<description>a Compendium of Successful Sustainability Practices</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 16:30:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A Cost Effective Operation and a Low Carbon Footprint for Solids Reduction Using Thermal Drying</title>
		<link>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/a-cost-effective-operation-and-a-low-carbon-footprint-for-solids-reduction-using-thermal-drying</link>
		<comments>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/a-cost-effective-operation-and-a-low-carbon-footprint-for-solids-reduction-using-thermal-drying#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 16:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[100K-500K]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Water Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cost Effective Solution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decreased Gas Consumption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Improved Plant Sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smaller Carbon Footprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solids reduction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sustainabilityarchive.com/?p=764</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many communities are faced with considering a change in how their boisolids processing and disposal programs will operate in the future. This discussion is coming about due to many biosolids processes that were installed in the 1970s and 1980s under a different era of reuse and regulation and reaching the end of their useful life. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many communities are faced with considering a change in how their boisolids processing and disposal<br />
programs will operate in the future. This discussion is coming about due to many biosolids processes that<br />
were installed in the 1970s and 1980s under a different era of reuse and regulation and reaching the end of<br />
their useful life.<br />
To move forward there needs to be the establishment of objectives and goals that an evaluation is to be<br />
built around for the future needs of biosolids processing for the owner/authority. The evaluation should<br />
indentify the process that will be the most cost effective in capital and operation and maintenance costs. In<br />
addition, with today’s concerns regarding climate change every evaluation should evaluate the carbon<br />
footprint created by the various processes.<br />
This is a case study of one evaluation done by the author that turned into a thermal dryer project that has<br />
now been in operation for over six years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/a-cost-effective-operation-and-a-low-carbon-footprint-for-solids-reduction-using-thermal-drying/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cannibal solids reduction technique integrated with activated sludge process</title>
		<link>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/cannibal-solids-reduction-technique-integrated-with-activated-sludge-process</link>
		<comments>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/cannibal-solids-reduction-technique-integrated-with-activated-sludge-process#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 20:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>caitlin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[<50K]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sanitary Sewer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Water Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sludge Handling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solids reduction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sustainabilityarchive.com/?p=20</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cannibal solids reduction technique integrated with activated sludge process requires lowest construction and operational costs, without generating a carbon footprint substantially larger than other alternatives. Source: WEFTEC Proceedings 2009  Plant Upgrades Optimized by Efficient Whole Plant Evaluations. 3.4 MGD, Conventional Secondary Treatment Facility, Oak Lodge  WWTP]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cannibal solids reduction technique integrated with activated sludge process requires lowest construction and operational costs, without generating a carbon footprint substantially larger than other alternatives. Source: WEFTEC Proceedings 2009  Plant Upgrades Optimized by Efficient Whole Plant Evaluations.</p>
<p>3.4 MGD, Conventional Secondary Treatment Facility, Oak Lodge  WWTP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/cannibal-solids-reduction-technique-integrated-with-activated-sludge-process/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

