<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sustainability Archive &#187; Improved Sludge Handling</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sustainabilityarchive.com/tag/improved-sludge-handling/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sustainabilityarchive.com</link>
	<description>a Compendium of Successful Sustainability Practices</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 16:30:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>EBPR With Struvite Recovery to Reduce Chemical Consumption and Increase Nutrient Removal Reliability</title>
		<link>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/ebpr-with-struvite-recovery-to-reduce-chemical-consumption-and-increase-nutrient-removal-reliability</link>
		<comments>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/ebpr-with-struvite-recovery-to-reduce-chemical-consumption-and-increase-nutrient-removal-reliability#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 19:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Waste Water Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cost Savings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Improved Sludge Handling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sustainabilityarchive.com/?p=326</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two alternatives were investigated for reducing chemical addition at a water reclamation facility with regional anaerobic digestion recycle streams: 1. the MLE process with alum addition for P removal and denitrifying filters for N removal (MLE alternative), and 2. the 5-stage Bardenpho alternative process for enhanced biological phosphorus removal, activated sludge biological denitrification using methanol [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two alternatives were investigated for reducing chemical addition at a water reclamation facility with regional anaerobic digestion recycle streams: 1. the MLE process with alum addition for P removal and denitrifying filters for N removal (MLE alternative), and 2. the 5-stage Bardenpho alternative process for enhanced biological phosphorus removal, activated sludge biological denitrification using methanol addition and the Ostara struvite-recovery recycles treatment process. The 5-stage Bardenpho alternative resulted in annual cost operational savings of $640,000-$800,000 compared to MLE alternative, a 13- to 18-year payback period, reduced chemical and electrical energy consumption, and increased net digester methane gas production. Source: WEFTEC Proceedings 2009</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/ebpr-with-struvite-recovery-to-reduce-chemical-consumption-and-increase-nutrient-removal-reliability/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

