<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sustainability Archive</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sustainabilityarchive.com/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sustainabilityarchive.com</link>
	<description>a Compendium of Successful Sustainability Practices</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 16:30:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>NEW PLANT IMPROVEMENTS RESULT IN SUBSTANTIAL O&amp;M COST SAVINGS</title>
		<link>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/new-plant-improvements-result-in-substantial-om-cost-savings</link>
		<comments>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/new-plant-improvements-result-in-substantial-om-cost-savings#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 16:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[<50K]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Water Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Improved Treatment Plant Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[O&M Cost Savings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plant Improvement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sustainabilityarchive.com/?p=761</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Hangtown Creek Water Reclamation Facility (HCWRF) is located in the Sierra Nevada foothills of Northern California. The treatment plant capacity is 101 L/s (2.3 mgd) average dry weather flow. Substantial improvements were required to comply with new waste discharge requirements (including nutrient removal, year-round tertiary treatment, reduction of disinfection byproducts, and effluent cooling) and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Hangtown Creek Water Reclamation Facility (HCWRF) is located in the Sierra Nevada<br />
foothills of Northern California. The treatment plant capacity is 101 L/s (2.3 mgd) average dry<br />
weather flow. Substantial improvements were required to comply with new waste discharge<br />
requirements (including nutrient removal, year-round tertiary treatment, reduction of disinfection<br />
byproducts, and effluent cooling) and a cease and desist order, sludge treatment regulations, to<br />
address safety issues. A substantial increase in annual operation and maintenance (O&amp;M) cost<br />
was probable with the addition of the upgraded treatment processes and need to meet more<br />
stringent effluent limits.<br />
The design strategy included upgrading critical processes and replacing inefficient outdated<br />
technology to improve treatment plant efficiency while mitigating increases in overall operation<br />
O&amp;M cost. Since the City service area is of limited size and the number of connections is not<br />
growing, controlling O&amp;M costs was a major concern of the City.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/new-plant-improvements-result-in-substantial-om-cost-savings/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Not-So-Silent Risk of Improper Controls &#8211; Water Hammer</title>
		<link>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/the-not-so-silent-risk-of-improper-controls-water-hammer</link>
		<comments>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/the-not-so-silent-risk-of-improper-controls-water-hammer#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 16:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Equipment Protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lower Capital Cost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personnel Protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reduced Power Costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smaller Carbon Footprint]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sustainabilityarchive.com/?p=759</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whether large or small pumps, there comes a debate when multiple drive motors are used to cover a broad range ofoutput flow requirements: use one Variable Frequency Drive (VFD) plus a number of softstarts, some small and some large pumps with or without VFD&#8217;s, one or more VFD&#8217;s on a group ofpumps, and all combinations [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whether large or small pumps, there comes a debate when multiple drive motors are used to<br />
cover a broad range ofoutput flow requirements: use one Variable Frequency Drive (VFD) plus<br />
a number of softstarts, some small and some large pumps with or without VFD&#8217;s, one or more<br />
VFD&#8217;s on a group ofpumps, and all combinations in between. Equipment rotation and<br />
maintenance, starts per hour, starts per day, minimum flows, maximum demands, etc., all are<br />
considerations and decisions to be made. Many of these combinations invoke unintended<br />
hydraulic consequences. The focus ofthis paper is the benefits of synchronous, closed transition<br />
hand-off between VFD&#8217;s and utility powered devices in multi-motor applications. Using off-theshelf,<br />
standard, available equipment that can synchronize drive output with across-the-line loads,<br />
the best of numerous options can be had while reducing power costs, protecting personnel and<br />
equipment, and achieving process control.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/the-not-so-silent-risk-of-improper-controls-water-hammer/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Improving Utility O&amp;M and Capital Decisions by Incorporating the Concepts of Asset Condition, Criticality and Risk</title>
		<link>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/improving-utility-om-and-capital-decisions-by-incorporating-the-concepts-of-asset-condition-criticality-and-risk</link>
		<comments>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/improving-utility-om-and-capital-decisions-by-incorporating-the-concepts-of-asset-condition-criticality-and-risk#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 16:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[50k-100k]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sanitary Sewer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stormwater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Water Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capitol Planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Improved Asset Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Improved Operation and Maintenance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sustainabilityarchive.com/?p=755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Toho Water Authority (TWA) provides water, wastewater and reclaimed water service to approximately 85,000 customers in Kissimmee Florida. For the past three years the Utility has been implementing an asset management program for their over $700 million dollars worth of water, wastewater, and reclaimed water assets. During this program TWA has made significant investments in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Toho Water Authority (TWA) provides water, wastewater and reclaimed water service to<br />
approximately 85,000 customers in Kissimmee Florida. For the past three years the Utility has<br />
been implementing an asset management program for their over $700 million dollars worth of<br />
water, wastewater, and reclaimed water assets. During this program TWA has made significant<br />
investments in asset management information systems including INFOR EAM Computer<br />
Maintenance Management System (CMMS) and an ESRI Geographic Information System (GIS)<br />
database. These two systems now contain the comprehensive asset inventory for the utility. A<br />
built-in interface between the programs allows the CMMS and GIS to integrate and share<br />
information.<br />
Once the software implementation and inventory was complete, TWA wanted to obtain<br />
additional physical, financial, and asset management attributes for their assets to support the<br />
overall asset management program, which includes evaluating asset risk, measuring utility<br />
performance and effectively planning for future renewal and replacement needs. The CMMS<br />
software was configured to store the attribute data in January of 2008 after conducting interactive<br />
workshops with staff to define the attributes. In August of 2008 a pilot project was implemented<br />
to define the process to consistently collect and calculate the asset data including condition,<br />
consequence of failure, risk, and replacement cost for all vertical assets in the utility. The pilot<br />
area contained one water plant, one wastewater plant and 47 lift stations that fed the wastewater<br />
plant. This paper will describe the methodology that was established to obtain and calculate the<br />
data, the results of the data analysis, and uses for the data to further their asset management<br />
program and overall decision making.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/improving-utility-om-and-capital-decisions-by-incorporating-the-concepts-of-asset-condition-criticality-and-risk/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Evaluation of Onsite Sodium Hypochlorite Generation at the Blue Plains Advanced Wastewater Treatment Plant</title>
		<link>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/evaluation-of-onsite-sodium-hypochlorite-generation-at-the-blue-plains-advanced-wastewater-treatment-plant</link>
		<comments>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/evaluation-of-onsite-sodium-hypochlorite-generation-at-the-blue-plains-advanced-wastewater-treatment-plant#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 16:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[100K-500K]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Water Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Savings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Improved Plant Reliability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[O&M Cost Savings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sustainabilityarchive.com/?p=795</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Due to potential risks associated with transportation and handling of liquid chlorine, the District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority (DC Water), switched to the use of liquid sodium hypochlorite as the disinfecting agent at the Blue Plains Advanced Wastewater Treatment Plant (AWTP). The escalating cost of bulk purchased sodium hypochlorite prompted DC Water to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Due to potential risks associated with transportation and handling of liquid chlorine, the District<br />
of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority (DC Water), switched to the use of liquid sodium<br />
hypochlorite as the disinfecting agent at the Blue Plains Advanced Wastewater Treatment Plant<br />
(AWTP). The escalating cost of bulk purchased sodium hypochlorite prompted DC Water to<br />
commission a study to evaluate disinfection alternatives that: 1) are compatible with existing<br />
treatment processes; 2) meet all plant effluent disinfection requirements; and 3) reduce life cycle<br />
costs of disinfection.<br />
The study involved a detailed technical, economic and non-economic evaluation of the feasibility<br />
of constructing and operating an onsite sodium hypochlorite generation facility in lieu of bulk<br />
purchase. Economic analyses included capital and O&amp;M costs, life cycle costs over a 30-year<br />
time horizon, and sensitivity of price of bulk sodium hypochlorite and salt, electric power cost,<br />
debt service on life cycle costs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/evaluation-of-onsite-sodium-hypochlorite-generation-at-the-blue-plains-advanced-wastewater-treatment-plant/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Decentralized Membrane Bioreactors for Water Reuse in Paulding County, Georgia</title>
		<link>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/decentralized-membrane-bioreactors-for-water-reuse-in-paulding-county-georgia</link>
		<comments>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/decentralized-membrane-bioreactors-for-water-reuse-in-paulding-county-georgia#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 16:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[100K-500K]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Water Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Improved Plant Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plant Sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reduced Carbon Footprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water Reuse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sustainabilityarchive.com/?p=792</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Before the recession, Metro Atlanta and its surrounding counties were one of the fastest growing regions in the United States. In order to reduce the impact of treatment plant discharges on its limited water supply and to offset water demands on potable water systems, they were increasingly looking at water conservation and water reuse. Paulding [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before the recession, Metro Atlanta and its surrounding counties were one of the fastest growing<br />
regions in the United States. In order to reduce the impact of treatment plant discharges on its<br />
limited water supply and to offset water demands on potable water systems, they were<br />
increasingly looking at water conservation and water reuse. Paulding County was one of those<br />
fast-growing counties, consistently ranked between the 12th and 15th fastest growing counties in<br />
the United States. Wastewater treatment facilities are among the most critical to support the<br />
County’s rapid population increase. With tighter effluent limits on the way and a halt on surface<br />
water discharge permits, the County had to look at alternative uses for the treated wastewater.<br />
Several technologies were evaluated, and based on this evaluation, MBR technology became the<br />
apparent leader. This paper provides an overview of the selection process, the procurement<br />
process, and the performance of four MBR systems currently operating in Paulding County.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/decentralized-membrane-bioreactors-for-water-reuse-in-paulding-county-georgia/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cost Savings and Performance Improvement of Large System Iron Salt Use for Integrated Sulfide Control and Chemically Enhanced Primary Treatment by Using Peroxide Regenerated Iron Technology</title>
		<link>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/cost-savings-and-performance-improvement-of-large-system-iron-salt-use-for-integrated-sulfide-control-and-chemically-enhanced-primary-treatment-by-using-peroxide-regenerated-iron-technology</link>
		<comments>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/cost-savings-and-performance-improvement-of-large-system-iron-salt-use-for-integrated-sulfide-control-and-chemically-enhanced-primary-treatment-by-using-peroxide-regenerated-iron-technology#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 16:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[>1M]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Water Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chemically Enhanced Primary Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cost Savings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Improved Operational Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Improved Plant Effluent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Improved Plant Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sulfide Control]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sustainabilityarchive.com/?p=786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[San Diego’s Point Loma WWTP is a 160 MGD (240 MGD permitted), 100% advanced primary treatment plant that has historically used iron salts for collection system sulfide control and chemically enhanced primary treatment. Beginning in 2006, a PRI-SC® (Peroxide Regenerated Iron – Sulfide Control) program was implemented by adding H2O2 at the intermediate pump station [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>San Diego’s Point Loma WWTP is a 160 MGD (240 MGD permitted), 100% advanced primary<br />
treatment plant that has historically used iron salts for collection system sulfide control and<br />
chemically enhanced primary treatment. Beginning in 2006, a PRI-SC® (Peroxide Regenerated<br />
Iron – Sulfide Control) program was implemented by adding H2O2 at the intermediate pump<br />
station PS2 (in place of the FeCl3), and again to the plant influent (ahead of FeCl3 addition for<br />
CEPT). The application of PRI-SC® in the Point Loma system was designed to provide at least<br />
$685/day in cost savings, to be achieved through reduced ferric chloride use at PS2 and Point<br />
Loma, while improving sulfide control and CEPT performance. Since integrating the PRI-SC®<br />
program full-time in 2008, SDMWD is realizing savings of approximately $4,700 per day<br />
(~$1.72 million/yr) compared to the 2007 baseline iron salts program. At the same time, both<br />
sulfide control and CEPT performance has improved. The cost savings were helped by the<br />
hedging aspect of the PRI-SC® program – iron salt price volatility in 2008 and 2009 was<br />
upwards of 45%. The PRI program has reduced the total iron salt use from the 2007 baseline rate<br />
of 32.5 dry tons per day to approximately 19.3 dry tons per day in 2009, with the core savings<br />
coming from an overall reduction in ferric chloride use at PS2 and the treatment plant (Table 1).<br />
Significantly, ferric chloride use at PS2 was eliminated and, for CEPT, reduced from 24 mg/L to<br />
10 mg/L (16.6 to 6.8 dry tons per day) with no loss in performance. In addition, total sulfide<br />
removal has improved over baseline levels, and average CEPT performance exceeds the permit<br />
levels at 89% for TSS and 65% for BOD, and effluent water quality has improved (with 60% less<br />
spent iron (as FeS) present in the ocean discharge). For the most part, digester biogas H2S levels<br />
were maintained below the permit requirement of &lt; 40 ppm, but required approximately twice<br />
the baseline FeCl2 feed rate. Even so, the overall program has maintained the stated savings<br />
benefit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/cost-savings-and-performance-improvement-of-large-system-iron-salt-use-for-integrated-sulfide-control-and-chemically-enhanced-primary-treatment-by-using-peroxide-regenerated-iron-technology/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>POLYMER ADDITION COMBINED WITH RAPID DECREASE IN SOLIDS RETENTION TIME IS AN EFFECTIVE NOCARDIA FOAM CONTROL METHOD</title>
		<link>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/polymer-addition-combined-with-rapid-decrease-in-solids-retention-time-is-an-effective-nocardia-foam-control-method</link>
		<comments>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/polymer-addition-combined-with-rapid-decrease-in-solids-retention-time-is-an-effective-nocardia-foam-control-method#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 16:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[>1M]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Water Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Improved Plant Effluent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Improved Plant Operations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nocardia Foam Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reduced Solids Retention Time]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sustainabilityarchive.com/?p=783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this study, Nocardia foam control using a combination of polymer addition and solids retention time (SRT) reduction was investigated at the San Jose/Santa Clara Water Pollution Control Plant (SJ/SC WPCP). A three-week continuous polymer addition at increased dosing rates of 0.35 mg/l, 0.5 mg/l and 0.75 mg/l reduced Nocardia foam coverage from 100% to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this study, Nocardia foam control using a combination of polymer addition and solids<br />
retention time (SRT) reduction was investigated at the San Jose/Santa Clara Water Pollution<br />
Control Plant (SJ/SC WPCP). A three-week continuous polymer addition at increased dosing<br />
rates of 0.35 mg/l, 0.5 mg/l and 0.75 mg/l reduced Nocardia foam coverage from 100% to less<br />
than 5%. But, foam accumulation returned to 95% coverage when polymer dosing was stopped<br />
for a week. It only took a week to eliminate Nocardia foam from the aeration tanks when 0.5<br />
mg/l polymer addition was accompanied by SRT reduction from eleven days to four days. A<br />
potential effluent ammonia permit violation associated with SRT reduction was avoided by<br />
aerating the anoxic compartment of the aeration tanks and converting the step-feed biological<br />
process to plug flow mode. Except an increase in secondary effluent solids concentrations during<br />
plug flow operations, polymer addition to the return activated sludge (RAS) and Nocardia<br />
wasting to the digesters via dissolved air floatation did not cause foaming in the digesters nor<br />
was it detrimental to effluent filtration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/polymer-addition-combined-with-rapid-decrease-in-solids-retention-time-is-an-effective-nocardia-foam-control-method/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Converting Residuals To Reuse: Taking Aeration Out Of Oxidation</title>
		<link>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/converting-residuals-to-reuse-taking-aeration-out-of-oxidation</link>
		<comments>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/converting-residuals-to-reuse-taking-aeration-out-of-oxidation#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 16:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[<50K]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sanitary Sewer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stormwater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cost Savings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decreased Aeration Demand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decreased Energy Consumption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plant Sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smaller Carbon Footprint]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sustainabilityarchive.com/?p=779</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Aeration accounts for up to 60% of the total energy required for a typical activated sludge wastewater plant. A new process was developed that decreases aeration demand during secondary wastewater treatment. This process, called BIOBROx, blends oxidant-laden residuals with screened municipal wastewater followed by treatment in a fixed-bed (FXB) bioreactor. Pilot testing showed that the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aeration accounts for up to 60% of the total energy required for a typical activated sludge wastewater plant. A new process was developed that decreases aeration demand during secondary wastewater treatment. This process, called BIOBROx, blends oxidant-laden residuals with screened municipal wastewater followed by treatment in a fixed-bed (FXB) bioreactor. Pilot testing showed that the BIOBROx process was effective at removing perchlorate and nitrate from membrane residuals. Considerable biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) and suspended solids were also removed across the process. A 3.8-mgd BIOBROx demonstration facility is now operating at the Magna Water District. The BIOBROx train treats 1/3 to 1/2 of Magna’s total wastewater flow, uses no aeration, has an empty-bed contact time of 10 minutes, and has a footprint that is one-twentieth the size of the conventional secondary processes. Preliminary data show effluent that even under these conditions, BOD5 and TSS levels in the effluent from the BIOBROx process are similar to those in Magna’s conventional secondary treatment effluent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/converting-residuals-to-reuse-taking-aeration-out-of-oxidation/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Digital Revolution for Water/Wastewater Utility Management; From Paper to Digital Data</title>
		<link>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/digital-revolution-for-waterwastewater-utility-management-from-paper-to-digital-data</link>
		<comments>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/digital-revolution-for-waterwastewater-utility-management-from-paper-to-digital-data#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 16:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Waste Water Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Control Personnel Costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Improve Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Improve Plant Reliability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Improved Problem Solving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Increase Operator Productivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Increased Plant Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Long-Range Planning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sustainabilityarchive.com/?p=773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Paper-based data is a long-term fixture of the Water and Wastewater Industry including both Municipalities and Private Operating Companies. Transcribing handwritten log sheets into multiple Excel spreadsheets is inefficient. It is common for monthly operation and compliance reports to take days to compile, compared to digital systems that take minutes. Implementing a digital data solution [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paper-based data is a long-term fixture of the Water and Wastewater Industry including both<br />
Municipalities and Private Operating Companies. Transcribing handwritten log sheets into multiple Excel<br />
spreadsheets is inefficient. It is common for monthly operation and compliance reports to take days to<br />
compile, compared to digital systems that take minutes. Implementing a digital data solution provides a<br />
more efficient and lower cost system with centralized information and reports.<br />
Two questions that are addressed are how to make the transition to digital data and what kind of<br />
technology to use. Points to consider when evaluating replacing the Operators’ handwritten log sheets<br />
with an inexpensive, hand-held device:</p>
<ul>
<li> Initial equipment costs</li>
<li>Replacement costs</li>
<li>Required IT support</li>
<li>Standard or non-standard operating system or software</li>
<li>Security needs</li>
<li>Required training</li>
</ul>
<p>Three case studies highlight the successes realized after operations replaced traditional paper log sheets with a digital system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/digital-revolution-for-waterwastewater-utility-management-from-paper-to-digital-data/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Project Management – Overcoming Resistance to Change</title>
		<link>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/project-management-%e2%80%93-overcoming-resistance-to-change</link>
		<comments>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/project-management-%e2%80%93-overcoming-resistance-to-change#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 16:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[>1M]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stormwater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Water Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cost Savings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Improved Plant Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Project Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sustainabilityarchive.com/?p=771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The purpose of this paper is to help project managers in public agencies understand the reasons for resistance to change and provide steps to overcome or minimize the resistance. These are challenging times for all public agencies so there is a need to be wise stewards of public resources. An increase in efficiency may require [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The purpose of this paper is to help project managers in public agencies understand the reasons<br />
for resistance to change and provide steps to overcome or minimize the resistance. These are<br />
challenging times for all public agencies so there is a need to be wise stewards of public<br />
resources. An increase in efficiency may require reorganizing departments, reallocating<br />
resources and realigning staff roles and responsibilities and managing projects differently. These<br />
all require change and growth from all levels of employees in an organization. Reducing the<br />
resistance to change requires strong leadership qualities combined with proper project<br />
management skills. If these combined skills are incorporated into projects that implement<br />
change, they will be successful and can result in significant cost savings. The Orange County<br />
Sanitation District (OCSD) has undergone many of the aforementioned changes in the past<br />
couple of years and continues its austerity through efficiency while completing all tasks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/project-management-%e2%80%93-overcoming-resistance-to-change/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

