<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sustainability Archive &#187; Type of Utility</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sustainabilityarchive.com/category/type-of-utility/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sustainabilityarchive.com</link>
	<description>a Compendium of Successful Sustainability Practices</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 16:30:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Improving Utility O&amp;M and Capital Decisions by Incorporating the Concepts of Asset Condition, Criticality and Risk</title>
		<link>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/improving-utility-om-and-capital-decisions-by-incorporating-the-concepts-of-asset-condition-criticality-and-risk</link>
		<comments>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/improving-utility-om-and-capital-decisions-by-incorporating-the-concepts-of-asset-condition-criticality-and-risk#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 16:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[50k-100k]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sanitary Sewer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stormwater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Water Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capitol Planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Improved Asset Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Improved Operation and Maintenance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sustainabilityarchive.com/?p=755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Toho Water Authority (TWA) provides water, wastewater and reclaimed water service to approximately 85,000 customers in Kissimmee Florida. For the past three years the Utility has been implementing an asset management program for their over $700 million dollars worth of water, wastewater, and reclaimed water assets. During this program TWA has made significant investments in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Toho Water Authority (TWA) provides water, wastewater and reclaimed water service to<br />
approximately 85,000 customers in Kissimmee Florida. For the past three years the Utility has<br />
been implementing an asset management program for their over $700 million dollars worth of<br />
water, wastewater, and reclaimed water assets. During this program TWA has made significant<br />
investments in asset management information systems including INFOR EAM Computer<br />
Maintenance Management System (CMMS) and an ESRI Geographic Information System (GIS)<br />
database. These two systems now contain the comprehensive asset inventory for the utility. A<br />
built-in interface between the programs allows the CMMS and GIS to integrate and share<br />
information.<br />
Once the software implementation and inventory was complete, TWA wanted to obtain<br />
additional physical, financial, and asset management attributes for their assets to support the<br />
overall asset management program, which includes evaluating asset risk, measuring utility<br />
performance and effectively planning for future renewal and replacement needs. The CMMS<br />
software was configured to store the attribute data in January of 2008 after conducting interactive<br />
workshops with staff to define the attributes. In August of 2008 a pilot project was implemented<br />
to define the process to consistently collect and calculate the asset data including condition,<br />
consequence of failure, risk, and replacement cost for all vertical assets in the utility. The pilot<br />
area contained one water plant, one wastewater plant and 47 lift stations that fed the wastewater<br />
plant. This paper will describe the methodology that was established to obtain and calculate the<br />
data, the results of the data analysis, and uses for the data to further their asset management<br />
program and overall decision making.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/improving-utility-om-and-capital-decisions-by-incorporating-the-concepts-of-asset-condition-criticality-and-risk/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NEW PLANT IMPROVEMENTS RESULT IN SUBSTANTIAL O&amp;M COST SAVINGS</title>
		<link>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/new-plant-improvements-result-in-substantial-om-cost-savings</link>
		<comments>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/new-plant-improvements-result-in-substantial-om-cost-savings#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 16:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[<50K]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Water Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Improved Treatment Plant Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[O&M Cost Savings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plant Improvement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sustainabilityarchive.com/?p=761</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Hangtown Creek Water Reclamation Facility (HCWRF) is located in the Sierra Nevada foothills of Northern California. The treatment plant capacity is 101 L/s (2.3 mgd) average dry weather flow. Substantial improvements were required to comply with new waste discharge requirements (including nutrient removal, year-round tertiary treatment, reduction of disinfection byproducts, and effluent cooling) and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Hangtown Creek Water Reclamation Facility (HCWRF) is located in the Sierra Nevada<br />
foothills of Northern California. The treatment plant capacity is 101 L/s (2.3 mgd) average dry<br />
weather flow. Substantial improvements were required to comply with new waste discharge<br />
requirements (including nutrient removal, year-round tertiary treatment, reduction of disinfection<br />
byproducts, and effluent cooling) and a cease and desist order, sludge treatment regulations, to<br />
address safety issues. A substantial increase in annual operation and maintenance (O&amp;M) cost<br />
was probable with the addition of the upgraded treatment processes and need to meet more<br />
stringent effluent limits.<br />
The design strategy included upgrading critical processes and replacing inefficient outdated<br />
technology to improve treatment plant efficiency while mitigating increases in overall operation<br />
O&amp;M cost. Since the City service area is of limited size and the number of connections is not<br />
growing, controlling O&amp;M costs was a major concern of the City.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/new-plant-improvements-result-in-substantial-om-cost-savings/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Cost Effective Operation and a Low Carbon Footprint for Solids Reduction Using Thermal Drying</title>
		<link>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/a-cost-effective-operation-and-a-low-carbon-footprint-for-solids-reduction-using-thermal-drying</link>
		<comments>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/a-cost-effective-operation-and-a-low-carbon-footprint-for-solids-reduction-using-thermal-drying#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 16:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[100K-500K]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Water Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cost Effective Solution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decreased Gas Consumption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Improved Plant Sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smaller Carbon Footprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solids reduction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sustainabilityarchive.com/?p=764</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many communities are faced with considering a change in how their boisolids processing and disposal programs will operate in the future. This discussion is coming about due to many biosolids processes that were installed in the 1970s and 1980s under a different era of reuse and regulation and reaching the end of their useful life. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many communities are faced with considering a change in how their boisolids processing and disposal<br />
programs will operate in the future. This discussion is coming about due to many biosolids processes that<br />
were installed in the 1970s and 1980s under a different era of reuse and regulation and reaching the end of<br />
their useful life.<br />
To move forward there needs to be the establishment of objectives and goals that an evaluation is to be<br />
built around for the future needs of biosolids processing for the owner/authority. The evaluation should<br />
indentify the process that will be the most cost effective in capital and operation and maintenance costs. In<br />
addition, with today’s concerns regarding climate change every evaluation should evaluate the carbon<br />
footprint created by the various processes.<br />
This is a case study of one evaluation done by the author that turned into a thermal dryer project that has<br />
now been in operation for over six years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/a-cost-effective-operation-and-a-low-carbon-footprint-for-solids-reduction-using-thermal-drying/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Solar Drying of Biosolids – Recent Experiences in Large Installations</title>
		<link>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/solar-drying-of-biosolids-recent-experiences-in-large-installations</link>
		<comments>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/solar-drying-of-biosolids-recent-experiences-in-large-installations#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 16:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Waste Water Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cost Savings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decreased Energy Consumption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plant Sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smaller Carbon Footprint]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sustainabilityarchive.com/?p=766</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The conversion of raw sewage sludge into valuable biosolids for beneficial reuse requires a suitable pre-treatment process. However, traditional technologies are causing high investment costs, operation costs, and energy demand; or are not fully meeting the demands of the market. As recent experiences from the world&#8217;s largest solar drying and solar-assisted drying plants in Palma [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The conversion of raw sewage sludge into valuable biosolids for beneficial reuse requires a<br />
suitable pre-treatment process. However, traditional technologies are causing high investment<br />
costs, operation costs, and energy demand; or are not fully meeting the demands of the market.<br />
As recent experiences from the world&#8217;s largest solar drying and solar-assisted drying plants in<br />
Palma de Mallorca, Spain and Oldenburg, Germany show, solar drying is an effective alternative<br />
for large facilities. Drying costs and energy consumption are less than half, maintenance is low,<br />
and operation is simple and safe at these facilities when compared to traditional thermal dryers.<br />
Also, carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions are reduced by a factor of seven when compared to<br />
conventional dryers. By using waste heat from other processes, the area requirement can be<br />
reduced by a factor of three to five. The final product is suitable as fuel for Waste-to-Energy<br />
(WTE) plants, coal power plants, or cement kilns. It can also be used as a Class-A fertilizer for<br />
agricultural use, or land application.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/solar-drying-of-biosolids-recent-experiences-in-large-installations/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Project Prequalification Process The Do’s, The Don’ts, and The How To’s</title>
		<link>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/project-prequalification-process-the-do%e2%80%99s-the-don%e2%80%99ts-and-the-how-to%e2%80%99s</link>
		<comments>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/project-prequalification-process-the-do%e2%80%99s-the-don%e2%80%99ts-and-the-how-to%e2%80%99s#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 16:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Waste Water Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cost Savings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Improved Construction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reduced Stress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sustainabilityarchive.com/?p=768</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In 2004, Massachusetts passed another law regulating Public Construction in the Commonwealth. Being mostly engineers and owners, the first thing that comes to mind when you hear “law regulating public construction” is “how is this going to affect my project?” And the next thing you see is dollar signs floating through the air. This paper [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 2004, Massachusetts passed another law regulating Public Construction in the<br />
Commonwealth. Being mostly engineers and owners, the first thing that comes to mind when<br />
you hear “law regulating public construction” is “how is this going to affect my project?” And<br />
the next thing you see is dollar signs floating through the air. This paper will show you how this<br />
is one regulation and one process that will cost a little money and legwork upfront but will save<br />
you significant dollars, reduce stress, and benefit your project in the long term. Case studies will<br />
include the Westborough Wastewater Treatment Plant Upgrade Project, Nantucket Surfside<br />
Wastewater Treatment Plant Upgrade Project, Nantucket Public Safety Facility Project, and the<br />
Hopkinton Fruit Street Wastewater Treatment Plant Project. Topics will include the<br />
Massachusetts Chapter 193 of the Acts of 2004 and Division of Capital Asset Management and<br />
their influence on the Prequalification Process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/project-prequalification-process-the-do%e2%80%99s-the-don%e2%80%99ts-and-the-how-to%e2%80%99s/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Project Management – Overcoming Resistance to Change</title>
		<link>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/project-management-%e2%80%93-overcoming-resistance-to-change</link>
		<comments>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/project-management-%e2%80%93-overcoming-resistance-to-change#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 16:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[>1M]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stormwater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Water Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cost Savings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Improved Plant Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Project Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sustainabilityarchive.com/?p=771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The purpose of this paper is to help project managers in public agencies understand the reasons for resistance to change and provide steps to overcome or minimize the resistance. These are challenging times for all public agencies so there is a need to be wise stewards of public resources. An increase in efficiency may require [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The purpose of this paper is to help project managers in public agencies understand the reasons<br />
for resistance to change and provide steps to overcome or minimize the resistance. These are<br />
challenging times for all public agencies so there is a need to be wise stewards of public<br />
resources. An increase in efficiency may require reorganizing departments, reallocating<br />
resources and realigning staff roles and responsibilities and managing projects differently. These<br />
all require change and growth from all levels of employees in an organization. Reducing the<br />
resistance to change requires strong leadership qualities combined with proper project<br />
management skills. If these combined skills are incorporated into projects that implement<br />
change, they will be successful and can result in significant cost savings. The Orange County<br />
Sanitation District (OCSD) has undergone many of the aforementioned changes in the past<br />
couple of years and continues its austerity through efficiency while completing all tasks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/project-management-%e2%80%93-overcoming-resistance-to-change/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Digital Revolution for Water/Wastewater Utility Management; From Paper to Digital Data</title>
		<link>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/digital-revolution-for-waterwastewater-utility-management-from-paper-to-digital-data</link>
		<comments>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/digital-revolution-for-waterwastewater-utility-management-from-paper-to-digital-data#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 16:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Waste Water Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Control Personnel Costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Improve Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Improve Plant Reliability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Improved Problem Solving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Increase Operator Productivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Increased Plant Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Long-Range Planning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sustainabilityarchive.com/?p=773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Paper-based data is a long-term fixture of the Water and Wastewater Industry including both Municipalities and Private Operating Companies. Transcribing handwritten log sheets into multiple Excel spreadsheets is inefficient. It is common for monthly operation and compliance reports to take days to compile, compared to digital systems that take minutes. Implementing a digital data solution [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paper-based data is a long-term fixture of the Water and Wastewater Industry including both<br />
Municipalities and Private Operating Companies. Transcribing handwritten log sheets into multiple Excel<br />
spreadsheets is inefficient. It is common for monthly operation and compliance reports to take days to<br />
compile, compared to digital systems that take minutes. Implementing a digital data solution provides a<br />
more efficient and lower cost system with centralized information and reports.<br />
Two questions that are addressed are how to make the transition to digital data and what kind of<br />
technology to use. Points to consider when evaluating replacing the Operators’ handwritten log sheets<br />
with an inexpensive, hand-held device:</p>
<ul>
<li> Initial equipment costs</li>
<li>Replacement costs</li>
<li>Required IT support</li>
<li>Standard or non-standard operating system or software</li>
<li>Security needs</li>
<li>Required training</li>
</ul>
<p>Three case studies highlight the successes realized after operations replaced traditional paper log sheets with a digital system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/digital-revolution-for-waterwastewater-utility-management-from-paper-to-digital-data/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Converting Residuals To Reuse: Taking Aeration Out Of Oxidation</title>
		<link>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/converting-residuals-to-reuse-taking-aeration-out-of-oxidation</link>
		<comments>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/converting-residuals-to-reuse-taking-aeration-out-of-oxidation#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 16:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[<50K]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sanitary Sewer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stormwater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cost Savings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decreased Aeration Demand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decreased Energy Consumption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plant Sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smaller Carbon Footprint]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sustainabilityarchive.com/?p=779</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Aeration accounts for up to 60% of the total energy required for a typical activated sludge wastewater plant. A new process was developed that decreases aeration demand during secondary wastewater treatment. This process, called BIOBROx, blends oxidant-laden residuals with screened municipal wastewater followed by treatment in a fixed-bed (FXB) bioreactor. Pilot testing showed that the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aeration accounts for up to 60% of the total energy required for a typical activated sludge wastewater plant. A new process was developed that decreases aeration demand during secondary wastewater treatment. This process, called BIOBROx, blends oxidant-laden residuals with screened municipal wastewater followed by treatment in a fixed-bed (FXB) bioreactor. Pilot testing showed that the BIOBROx process was effective at removing perchlorate and nitrate from membrane residuals. Considerable biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) and suspended solids were also removed across the process. A 3.8-mgd BIOBROx demonstration facility is now operating at the Magna Water District. The BIOBROx train treats 1/3 to 1/2 of Magna’s total wastewater flow, uses no aeration, has an empty-bed contact time of 10 minutes, and has a footprint that is one-twentieth the size of the conventional secondary processes. Preliminary data show effluent that even under these conditions, BOD5 and TSS levels in the effluent from the BIOBROx process are similar to those in Magna’s conventional secondary treatment effluent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/converting-residuals-to-reuse-taking-aeration-out-of-oxidation/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>POLYMER ADDITION COMBINED WITH RAPID DECREASE IN SOLIDS RETENTION TIME IS AN EFFECTIVE NOCARDIA FOAM CONTROL METHOD</title>
		<link>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/polymer-addition-combined-with-rapid-decrease-in-solids-retention-time-is-an-effective-nocardia-foam-control-method</link>
		<comments>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/polymer-addition-combined-with-rapid-decrease-in-solids-retention-time-is-an-effective-nocardia-foam-control-method#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 16:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[>1M]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Water Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Improved Plant Effluent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Improved Plant Operations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nocardia Foam Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reduced Solids Retention Time]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sustainabilityarchive.com/?p=783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this study, Nocardia foam control using a combination of polymer addition and solids retention time (SRT) reduction was investigated at the San Jose/Santa Clara Water Pollution Control Plant (SJ/SC WPCP). A three-week continuous polymer addition at increased dosing rates of 0.35 mg/l, 0.5 mg/l and 0.75 mg/l reduced Nocardia foam coverage from 100% to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this study, Nocardia foam control using a combination of polymer addition and solids<br />
retention time (SRT) reduction was investigated at the San Jose/Santa Clara Water Pollution<br />
Control Plant (SJ/SC WPCP). A three-week continuous polymer addition at increased dosing<br />
rates of 0.35 mg/l, 0.5 mg/l and 0.75 mg/l reduced Nocardia foam coverage from 100% to less<br />
than 5%. But, foam accumulation returned to 95% coverage when polymer dosing was stopped<br />
for a week. It only took a week to eliminate Nocardia foam from the aeration tanks when 0.5<br />
mg/l polymer addition was accompanied by SRT reduction from eleven days to four days. A<br />
potential effluent ammonia permit violation associated with SRT reduction was avoided by<br />
aerating the anoxic compartment of the aeration tanks and converting the step-feed biological<br />
process to plug flow mode. Except an increase in secondary effluent solids concentrations during<br />
plug flow operations, polymer addition to the return activated sludge (RAS) and Nocardia<br />
wasting to the digesters via dissolved air floatation did not cause foaming in the digesters nor<br />
was it detrimental to effluent filtration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/polymer-addition-combined-with-rapid-decrease-in-solids-retention-time-is-an-effective-nocardia-foam-control-method/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cost Savings and Performance Improvement of Large System Iron Salt Use for Integrated Sulfide Control and Chemically Enhanced Primary Treatment by Using Peroxide Regenerated Iron Technology</title>
		<link>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/cost-savings-and-performance-improvement-of-large-system-iron-salt-use-for-integrated-sulfide-control-and-chemically-enhanced-primary-treatment-by-using-peroxide-regenerated-iron-technology</link>
		<comments>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/cost-savings-and-performance-improvement-of-large-system-iron-salt-use-for-integrated-sulfide-control-and-chemically-enhanced-primary-treatment-by-using-peroxide-regenerated-iron-technology#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 16:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[>1M]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Water Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chemically Enhanced Primary Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cost Savings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Improved Operational Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Improved Plant Effluent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Improved Plant Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sulfide Control]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sustainabilityarchive.com/?p=786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[San Diego’s Point Loma WWTP is a 160 MGD (240 MGD permitted), 100% advanced primary treatment plant that has historically used iron salts for collection system sulfide control and chemically enhanced primary treatment. Beginning in 2006, a PRI-SC® (Peroxide Regenerated Iron – Sulfide Control) program was implemented by adding H2O2 at the intermediate pump station [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>San Diego’s Point Loma WWTP is a 160 MGD (240 MGD permitted), 100% advanced primary<br />
treatment plant that has historically used iron salts for collection system sulfide control and<br />
chemically enhanced primary treatment. Beginning in 2006, a PRI-SC® (Peroxide Regenerated<br />
Iron – Sulfide Control) program was implemented by adding H2O2 at the intermediate pump<br />
station PS2 (in place of the FeCl3), and again to the plant influent (ahead of FeCl3 addition for<br />
CEPT). The application of PRI-SC® in the Point Loma system was designed to provide at least<br />
$685/day in cost savings, to be achieved through reduced ferric chloride use at PS2 and Point<br />
Loma, while improving sulfide control and CEPT performance. Since integrating the PRI-SC®<br />
program full-time in 2008, SDMWD is realizing savings of approximately $4,700 per day<br />
(~$1.72 million/yr) compared to the 2007 baseline iron salts program. At the same time, both<br />
sulfide control and CEPT performance has improved. The cost savings were helped by the<br />
hedging aspect of the PRI-SC® program – iron salt price volatility in 2008 and 2009 was<br />
upwards of 45%. The PRI program has reduced the total iron salt use from the 2007 baseline rate<br />
of 32.5 dry tons per day to approximately 19.3 dry tons per day in 2009, with the core savings<br />
coming from an overall reduction in ferric chloride use at PS2 and the treatment plant (Table 1).<br />
Significantly, ferric chloride use at PS2 was eliminated and, for CEPT, reduced from 24 mg/L to<br />
10 mg/L (16.6 to 6.8 dry tons per day) with no loss in performance. In addition, total sulfide<br />
removal has improved over baseline levels, and average CEPT performance exceeds the permit<br />
levels at 89% for TSS and 65% for BOD, and effluent water quality has improved (with 60% less<br />
spent iron (as FeS) present in the ocean discharge). For the most part, digester biogas H2S levels<br />
were maintained below the permit requirement of &lt; 40 ppm, but required approximately twice<br />
the baseline FeCl2 feed rate. Even so, the overall program has maintained the stated savings<br />
benefit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/cost-savings-and-performance-improvement-of-large-system-iron-salt-use-for-integrated-sulfide-control-and-chemically-enhanced-primary-treatment-by-using-peroxide-regenerated-iron-technology/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

