<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sustainability Archive &#187; &gt;1M</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sustainabilityarchive.com/category/population-served/1m/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sustainabilityarchive.com</link>
	<description>a Compendium of Successful Sustainability Practices</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 16:30:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Project Management – Overcoming Resistance to Change</title>
		<link>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/project-management-%e2%80%93-overcoming-resistance-to-change</link>
		<comments>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/project-management-%e2%80%93-overcoming-resistance-to-change#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 16:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[>1M]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stormwater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Water Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cost Savings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Improved Plant Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Project Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sustainabilityarchive.com/?p=771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The purpose of this paper is to help project managers in public agencies understand the reasons for resistance to change and provide steps to overcome or minimize the resistance. These are challenging times for all public agencies so there is a need to be wise stewards of public resources. An increase in efficiency may require [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The purpose of this paper is to help project managers in public agencies understand the reasons<br />
for resistance to change and provide steps to overcome or minimize the resistance. These are<br />
challenging times for all public agencies so there is a need to be wise stewards of public<br />
resources. An increase in efficiency may require reorganizing departments, reallocating<br />
resources and realigning staff roles and responsibilities and managing projects differently. These<br />
all require change and growth from all levels of employees in an organization. Reducing the<br />
resistance to change requires strong leadership qualities combined with proper project<br />
management skills. If these combined skills are incorporated into projects that implement<br />
change, they will be successful and can result in significant cost savings. The Orange County<br />
Sanitation District (OCSD) has undergone many of the aforementioned changes in the past<br />
couple of years and continues its austerity through efficiency while completing all tasks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/project-management-%e2%80%93-overcoming-resistance-to-change/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>POLYMER ADDITION COMBINED WITH RAPID DECREASE IN SOLIDS RETENTION TIME IS AN EFFECTIVE NOCARDIA FOAM CONTROL METHOD</title>
		<link>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/polymer-addition-combined-with-rapid-decrease-in-solids-retention-time-is-an-effective-nocardia-foam-control-method</link>
		<comments>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/polymer-addition-combined-with-rapid-decrease-in-solids-retention-time-is-an-effective-nocardia-foam-control-method#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 16:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[>1M]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Water Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Improved Plant Effluent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Improved Plant Operations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nocardia Foam Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reduced Solids Retention Time]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sustainabilityarchive.com/?p=783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this study, Nocardia foam control using a combination of polymer addition and solids retention time (SRT) reduction was investigated at the San Jose/Santa Clara Water Pollution Control Plant (SJ/SC WPCP). A three-week continuous polymer addition at increased dosing rates of 0.35 mg/l, 0.5 mg/l and 0.75 mg/l reduced Nocardia foam coverage from 100% to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this study, Nocardia foam control using a combination of polymer addition and solids<br />
retention time (SRT) reduction was investigated at the San Jose/Santa Clara Water Pollution<br />
Control Plant (SJ/SC WPCP). A three-week continuous polymer addition at increased dosing<br />
rates of 0.35 mg/l, 0.5 mg/l and 0.75 mg/l reduced Nocardia foam coverage from 100% to less<br />
than 5%. But, foam accumulation returned to 95% coverage when polymer dosing was stopped<br />
for a week. It only took a week to eliminate Nocardia foam from the aeration tanks when 0.5<br />
mg/l polymer addition was accompanied by SRT reduction from eleven days to four days. A<br />
potential effluent ammonia permit violation associated with SRT reduction was avoided by<br />
aerating the anoxic compartment of the aeration tanks and converting the step-feed biological<br />
process to plug flow mode. Except an increase in secondary effluent solids concentrations during<br />
plug flow operations, polymer addition to the return activated sludge (RAS) and Nocardia<br />
wasting to the digesters via dissolved air floatation did not cause foaming in the digesters nor<br />
was it detrimental to effluent filtration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/polymer-addition-combined-with-rapid-decrease-in-solids-retention-time-is-an-effective-nocardia-foam-control-method/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cost Savings and Performance Improvement of Large System Iron Salt Use for Integrated Sulfide Control and Chemically Enhanced Primary Treatment by Using Peroxide Regenerated Iron Technology</title>
		<link>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/cost-savings-and-performance-improvement-of-large-system-iron-salt-use-for-integrated-sulfide-control-and-chemically-enhanced-primary-treatment-by-using-peroxide-regenerated-iron-technology</link>
		<comments>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/cost-savings-and-performance-improvement-of-large-system-iron-salt-use-for-integrated-sulfide-control-and-chemically-enhanced-primary-treatment-by-using-peroxide-regenerated-iron-technology#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 16:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[>1M]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Water Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chemically Enhanced Primary Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cost Savings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Improved Operational Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Improved Plant Effluent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Improved Plant Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sulfide Control]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sustainabilityarchive.com/?p=786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[San Diego’s Point Loma WWTP is a 160 MGD (240 MGD permitted), 100% advanced primary treatment plant that has historically used iron salts for collection system sulfide control and chemically enhanced primary treatment. Beginning in 2006, a PRI-SC® (Peroxide Regenerated Iron – Sulfide Control) program was implemented by adding H2O2 at the intermediate pump station [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>San Diego’s Point Loma WWTP is a 160 MGD (240 MGD permitted), 100% advanced primary<br />
treatment plant that has historically used iron salts for collection system sulfide control and<br />
chemically enhanced primary treatment. Beginning in 2006, a PRI-SC® (Peroxide Regenerated<br />
Iron – Sulfide Control) program was implemented by adding H2O2 at the intermediate pump<br />
station PS2 (in place of the FeCl3), and again to the plant influent (ahead of FeCl3 addition for<br />
CEPT). The application of PRI-SC® in the Point Loma system was designed to provide at least<br />
$685/day in cost savings, to be achieved through reduced ferric chloride use at PS2 and Point<br />
Loma, while improving sulfide control and CEPT performance. Since integrating the PRI-SC®<br />
program full-time in 2008, SDMWD is realizing savings of approximately $4,700 per day<br />
(~$1.72 million/yr) compared to the 2007 baseline iron salts program. At the same time, both<br />
sulfide control and CEPT performance has improved. The cost savings were helped by the<br />
hedging aspect of the PRI-SC® program – iron salt price volatility in 2008 and 2009 was<br />
upwards of 45%. The PRI program has reduced the total iron salt use from the 2007 baseline rate<br />
of 32.5 dry tons per day to approximately 19.3 dry tons per day in 2009, with the core savings<br />
coming from an overall reduction in ferric chloride use at PS2 and the treatment plant (Table 1).<br />
Significantly, ferric chloride use at PS2 was eliminated and, for CEPT, reduced from 24 mg/L to<br />
10 mg/L (16.6 to 6.8 dry tons per day) with no loss in performance. In addition, total sulfide<br />
removal has improved over baseline levels, and average CEPT performance exceeds the permit<br />
levels at 89% for TSS and 65% for BOD, and effluent water quality has improved (with 60% less<br />
spent iron (as FeS) present in the ocean discharge). For the most part, digester biogas H2S levels<br />
were maintained below the permit requirement of &lt; 40 ppm, but required approximately twice<br />
the baseline FeCl2 feed rate. Even so, the overall program has maintained the stated savings<br />
benefit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/cost-savings-and-performance-improvement-of-large-system-iron-salt-use-for-integrated-sulfide-control-and-chemically-enhanced-primary-treatment-by-using-peroxide-regenerated-iron-technology/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>“Say it Loud, Say it Clear”: Effective Communication Under Duress</title>
		<link>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/%e2%80%9csay-it-loud-say-it-clear%e2%80%9d-effective-communication-under-duress</link>
		<comments>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/%e2%80%9csay-it-loud-say-it-clear%e2%80%9d-effective-communication-under-duress#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 16:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[>1M]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sanitary Sewer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stormwater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Water Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effective Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Improved Customer Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Improved Plant Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Improved Work Morale]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sustainabilityarchive.com/?p=820</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Difficult times require an extra effort when it comes to communication. With all of the talk about layoffs, budget cuts and salary reductions, utilities face an uphill battle against the internal “rumor mill”, declining morale during the current economic downturn, and external pressures to do more with less. A well-developed communication strategy is one key [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Difficult times require an extra effort when it comes to communication. With all of the talk<br />
about layoffs, budget cuts and salary reductions, utilities face an uphill battle against the internal<br />
“rumor mill”, declining morale during the current economic downturn, and external pressures to<br />
do more with less. A well-developed communication strategy is one key to sustaining<br />
performance in the face of these challenges.<br />
The Water Distribution and Transmission Division of the Miami-Dade Water and Sewer<br />
Department is meeting these challenges “head-on” with an aggressive communication program<br />
that has been developed and refined over a number of years. This presentation will highlight that<br />
program from the perspectives of the Division Chief, managers and supervisors, and employees.<br />
Extensive interviews at various levels of the organization identified key communication<br />
strategies and tactics that are helping this agency maintain a high level of performance through<br />
the most significant economic crisis the US has faced since the Great Depression. These<br />
strategies and tactics will be discussed in detail and results will be presented as a “business case”<br />
for optimizing communication during challenging times.<br />
Focus of Study and Results:<br />
This presentation will include discussion in communication topic areas including:<br />
1. General overview of communication strategies and tactics<br />
2. Types, frequencies, and styles for effective communication<br />
3. Directional communication – up, down, and across the organization<br />
4. Formal and informal communication methods and tools<br />
5. Strengths and weaknesses of various communication approaches<br />
6. Value and results from effective communication programs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/%e2%80%9csay-it-loud-say-it-clear%e2%80%9d-effective-communication-under-duress/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RECOVERY OF ALGAE FROM POND TREATMENT SYSTEMS</title>
		<link>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/recovery-of-algae-from-pond-treatment-systems</link>
		<comments>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/recovery-of-algae-from-pond-treatment-systems#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 16:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[>1M]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Water Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Algae Removal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Improved Plant Effluent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Improved Water Quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plant Sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reduced Carbon Footprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reduced Nitrogen Load]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reduced Nutrients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reduced Solids]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sustainabilityarchive.com/?p=826</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Waste Stabilization Ponds are used extensively for sewage treatment in moderate and tropical climates, and represent one of the most cost-effective, reliable and easily operated processes for the treating domestic and industrial wastes. One of the biggest problems associated with pond treatment, however, is the high algae concentrations in the effluent. In many cases algae [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Waste Stabilization Ponds are used extensively for sewage treatment in moderate and<br />
tropical climates, and represent one of the most cost-effective, reliable and easily<br />
operated processes for the treating domestic and industrial wastes. One of the biggest<br />
problems associated with pond treatment, however, is the high algae concentrations in the<br />
effluent. In many cases algae are not a desirable by-product and are themselves a source<br />
of secondary pollution, rich in carbonaceous and nitrogenous algae matter. This puts an<br />
environmental strain on the receiving waters. One of the recently improved ways to<br />
control algae is to use trickling filters with a heterotrophic biofilm created by augmenting<br />
readily available sustenance to the filter media. This paper examines some of the hybrid<br />
facilities being used that combine existing stabilization ponds with trickling filters or<br />
activated sludge for enhanced biological degradation and polishing of the final effluent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/recovery-of-algae-from-pond-treatment-systems/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anaerobic Co-Digestion for Increased Renewable Energy</title>
		<link>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/anaerobic-co-digestion-for-increased-renewable-energy</link>
		<comments>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/anaerobic-co-digestion-for-increased-renewable-energy#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 16:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[>1M]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sanitary Sewer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stormwater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Water Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cost Savings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Impact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Improved Plant Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Improved Plant Sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Increased Biogas Production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reduced Carbon Footprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reduced Greenhouse Gas Emissions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sustainabilityarchive.com/?p=857</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Significant opportunities exist to increase renewable energy production using existing municipal anaerobic digesters. Many wastes can be added to co-digest more carbon and produce more methane. The objectives of this study were to identify and compare potential co-digestates, determine synergistic, antagonistic and neutral co-digestion outcomes, quantify performance of co-digestion for selected wastes and estimate economic [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Significant opportunities exist to increase renewable energy production using existing municipal<br />
anaerobic digesters. Many wastes can be added to co-digest more carbon and produce more<br />
methane. The objectives of this study were to identify and compare potential co-digestates,<br />
determine synergistic, antagonistic and neutral co-digestion outcomes, quantify performance of<br />
co-digestion for selected wastes and estimate economic benefits. Over 80 wastes were identified<br />
from 54 facilities within 160 km of an existing municipal digester. The most promising wastes<br />
(26 wastes) were characterized by biochemical methane potential (BMP) and other testing. A<br />
simple economic comparison identified the greatest benefits for seven co-digestates.<br />
Performance was investigated using bench-scale digesters receiving synthetic primary sludge<br />
with and without co-digestates. Methane production rates in co-digesters were as much as 180%<br />
greater than anticipated from the additional chemical oxygen demand (COD). Therefore,<br />
significant synergism was observed. The VS destruction efficiencies were 49 and 33% higher<br />
when co-digestates were present. Co-digestion is one method to increase renewable energy<br />
production via anaerobic digestion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/anaerobic-co-digestion-for-increased-renewable-energy/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lessons Learned While Implementing a New SCADA System</title>
		<link>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/lessons-learned-while-implementing-a-new-scada-system</link>
		<comments>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/lessons-learned-while-implementing-a-new-scada-system#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 16:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[>1M]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sanitary Sewer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stormwater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Improved Plant Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Improved Plant Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Improved Plant Reliability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reduced Communication Failure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sustainabilityarchive.com/?p=866</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Sacramento Area Sewer District (District) is in the final stages of implementing a new Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) system for their 103 pump stations. While implementing this new SCADA system, the District faced many challenges and obstacles, such as developing the SCADA system requirements, designing the networking system, testing station communication, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Sacramento Area Sewer District (District) is in the final stages of implementing a new<br />
Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) system for their 103 pump stations. While<br />
implementing this new SCADA system, the District faced many challenges and obstacles, such<br />
as developing the SCADA system requirements, designing the networking system, testing station<br />
communication, and cutover to the new SCADA system. Implementing a new SCADA system<br />
has provided the District with valuable experience that can be shared with other sewer agencies<br />
that may also be in the process of replacing their SCADA system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/lessons-learned-while-implementing-a-new-scada-system/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FOG – Figuring Out Good Solution to Fats, Oils and Grease in Advanced Wastewater Treatment Systems</title>
		<link>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/fog-%e2%80%93-figuring-out-good-solution-to-fats-oils-and-grease-in-advanced-wastewater-treatment-systems</link>
		<comments>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/fog-%e2%80%93-figuring-out-good-solution-to-fats-oils-and-grease-in-advanced-wastewater-treatment-systems#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 16:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[>1M]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stormwater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Water Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advanced Wastewater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cost Effective Alternative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oils and Grease (FOG) Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Optimize Water Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reduced O&M Problems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reduced Pipe Clogging]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sustainabilityarchive.com/?p=931</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department (MDWASD) is implementing a major upgrade program at the South District WWTP in response to capacity upgrade requirements, regulatory mandates and commitments to optimize water resources. In the recent past, MDWASD initiated implementation of one of the largest High Level Disinfection Programs in the country (285-mgd peak hour). In [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department (MDWASD) is implementing a major upgrade<br />
program at the South District WWTP in response to capacity upgrade requirements, regulatory<br />
mandates and commitments to optimize water resources. In the recent past, MDWASD initiated<br />
implementation of one of the largest High Level Disinfection Programs in the country (285-mgd<br />
peak hour). In general, wastewater treatment facilities deal with a large number of operating and<br />
maintenance concerns, not the least of which is Figuring Out Good solutions to Fats, Oils and<br />
Grease (FOG) problems. The MDWASD SDWWTP has unique FOG problems including typical<br />
clogging and aesthetics concerns as well as the presence of very fine and dispersed FOG in its<br />
secondary effluent. The chemical composition and characteristics of FOG result in an inherent<br />
difficulty with its treatment and its impacts to WWTP’s, especially for effluent polishing (filtration<br />
and chlorination) and advanced treatment with membranes. Based upon significant concerns<br />
for impacts of Fats, Oils and Grease levels on the existing secondary WWTP and concerns for<br />
clogging of 30 planned, large deep bed filters with a capacity rating of 285 mgd, an intensive<br />
field sampling, testing and evaluation program for FOG sources and treatment options was completed.<br />
Results of this evaluation were presented at WEFTEC 2005, and are hereinafter referred<br />
to as “FOG Part 1”. Under FOG Part 1, FOG clogging of main WWTP pipelines, and existing<br />
continuous backwash filters for effluent reuse onsite resulted in a detailed sampling and analytical<br />
program that reviewed and characterized FOG sources. FOG characterization in the septage,<br />
leachate and influent sources to the WWTP were addressed. Based upon this characterization,<br />
influent sources and clarifier scum removal were identified as key areas of focus in the WWTP.<br />
Related improvements to these key areas including the addition of a Septage Receiving and<br />
Treatment System at the front end of the WWTP, improvements to FOG removal at the secondary<br />
clarifiers, direct removal or vacuum removal of FOG from the wastewater flow stream, additional<br />
separation and concentration of FOG that is removed from the wastewater flow, and the<br />
addition of a select residuals management system for mixing, handling and disposal of FOG<br />
along with other residuals (grit, screenings, etc) were recommended at this secondary plant in<br />
preparation for the addition of an HLD system. These improvements are currently under construction<br />
with a planned completion of around fall of 2011.<br />
Concurrent with the HLD and FOG upgrades, MDWASD is implementing one of the country’s<br />
largest water reclamation facilities – 21-mgd treatment, delivery of 18.6 mgd of finished product<br />
water, used for augmentation of Miami-Dade County’s drinking water supply through groundwater<br />
recharge. Thus, potential impacts of FOG on advanced treatment membrane processes- microfiltration<br />
(MF) and reverse osmosis (RO) needed to be investigated due to potentially significant<br />
impacts to capital costs, operation and maintenance and downtime that could limit capability<br />
for reliably providing the necessary quantities of water to augment drinking water supplies in this<br />
region.<br />
An advanced treatment pilot system was constructed and tested using secondary effluent at the<br />
SDWWTP. The pilot system consisted of deep bed filters and high level disinfection (HLD) with<br />
chlorine solution, plus advanced wastewater treatment processes including MF, RO, ion exchange<br />
(IX) and ultraviolet disinfection with advanced oxidation (UV-A). The pilot was utilized<br />
to demonstrate treatment capability of the proposed process units, define design criteria, and better<br />
understand operational and maintenance issues and potential concerns such as FOG.<br />
At the time of the pilot testing, the majority of the upgrades for improved FOG removal from the<br />
secondary process were still under construction, and therefore, the reclamation pilot was tested<br />
under “worst-case” conditions from a FOG perspective. FOG influent and effluent data were collected<br />
and analyzed. The pilot deep bed filter system removed FOG from the secondary process -<br />
FOG levels of roughly 1 to 11 mg/l were reduced to roughly 1 to 3 mg/l. Also, visual observations<br />
indicate that this removal of FOG at the filters did not impact the filter media. However,<br />
due to the nature of the fine FOG particles at SDWWTP, FOG downstream of the filters still<br />
needed to be addressed from the perspective of potential accumulation on the membranes. Regarding<br />
potential impacts of FOG on the membranes, specific flux plotted versus run time for the<br />
RO membranes shows relatively stable specific flux values, with gradual decline over a duration<br />
of about 3 months. A cleaning cycle then was implemented for collection of “cleanability” data.<br />
Subsequent to cleaning, the data generally show an increase in specific flux to roughly the initial<br />
specific flux rate of the membranes which supports that FOG did not accumulate on the membranes.<br />
Similarly, Permeate Conductivity Versus Run Time and showing Differential Pressure<br />
Versus Run Time indicate relatively stable data over roughly 3 months. In general, pilot testing<br />
supports that FOG, which has been a concern for the South District Secondary WWTP, is not<br />
anticipated to impact the advanced treatment processes for production of reclaimed water that<br />
will supplement the Miami-Dade County drinking water supply through groundwater recharging.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/fog-%e2%80%93-figuring-out-good-solution-to-fats-oils-and-grease-in-advanced-wastewater-treatment-systems/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intermittent Carbon Addition Effectively Trims Effluent Nitrate</title>
		<link>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/intermittent-carbon-addition-effectively-trims-effluent-nitrate</link>
		<comments>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/intermittent-carbon-addition-effectively-trims-effluent-nitrate#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 16:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[>1M]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stormwater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Water Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Construction Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decreased Effluent Nitrate Concentrations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enhanced Denitrification Process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Improved Plant Confidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Permit Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plant Optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reduced Effluent Contaminants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sustainabilityarchive.com/?p=937</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ongoing construction at the Robert W. Hite Treatment Facility in Denver, CO, requires taking up to 25 percent of the secondary treatment capacity off-line for extended periods of time. Weekly average effluent limits for nitrate require diligent management of day-to-day performance to prevent excursions and maintain consistent denitrification. Process modeling indicated intermittent carbon limitations for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ongoing construction at the Robert W. Hite Treatment Facility in Denver, CO, requires taking up to 25<br />
percent of the secondary treatment capacity off-line for extended periods of time. Weekly average effluent<br />
limits for nitrate require diligent management of day-to-day performance to prevent excursions and<br />
maintain consistent denitrification. Process modeling indicated intermittent carbon limitations for<br />
denitrification during the construction period, leading to design and installation of a temporary carbon<br />
addition system. Acetic acid was selected as a supplemental carbon source due to intermittent demands.<br />
Performance testing of the acetic acid addition system at the RWHTF gave treatment personnel<br />
confidence in its operation and performance. The carbon addition system assisted in maintaining<br />
compliance with weekly nitrate effluent limits during construction and remains in occasional use. This<br />
paper reviews the potential limiting factors for denitrification, solutions for compliance during<br />
construction, and general criteria for supplemental carbon addition chemical selection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/intermittent-carbon-addition-effectively-trims-effluent-nitrate/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Efficient Control of Odors and VOC Emissions via Activated Carbon Technology</title>
		<link>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/efficient-control-of-odors-and-voc-emissions-via-activated-carbon-technology</link>
		<comments>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/efficient-control-of-odors-and-voc-emissions-via-activated-carbon-technology#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 16:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[>1M]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stormwater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Water Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cost Effective Odor Monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cost Effective VOC Monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cost Savings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Efficient Active Carbon Application]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Impact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Increased Public Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Odor Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VOC Reduction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sustainabilityarchive.com/?p=939</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The goal of this research study is to enhance the efficiency and economy of carbon scrubbers in controlling odors and VOCs at the wastewater collection and treatment facilities of Bureau of Sanitation, City of Los Angeles. The objectives are: 1) to use carbon life expectancy and breakthrough methods for monitoring carbon towers; 2) to reduce [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The goal of this research study is to enhance the efficiency and economy of carbon scrubbers in<br />
controlling odors and VOCs at the wastewater collection and treatment facilities of Bureau of<br />
Sanitation, City of Los Angeles. The objectives are: 1) to use carbon life expectancy and<br />
breakthrough methods for monitoring carbon towers; 2) to reduce harmful impacts of pollutants<br />
on public health and the environment; 3) and to recommend efficient active carbon application.<br />
The butane activity and hydrogen sulfide breakthrough capacity of activated carbon were<br />
assessed. Air streams were measured for odorous gases and VOCs. Single-stage wet scrubbers at<br />
some wastewater treatment processes, while removing moderate levels of reduced sulfur<br />
compounds, showed low to negative removal of VOCs when compared to carbon towers alone or<br />
in series. Regular monitoring of activated carbon has resulted in useful information on carbon<br />
change-out frequency and packing recommendations to enhance odor- and VOC-removal<br />
capacity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/efficient-control-of-odors-and-voc-emissions-via-activated-carbon-technology/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

