<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sustainability Archive &#187; &lt;50K</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sustainabilityarchive.com/category/population-served/1-50000/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sustainabilityarchive.com</link>
	<description>a Compendium of Successful Sustainability Practices</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 16:30:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>NEW PLANT IMPROVEMENTS RESULT IN SUBSTANTIAL O&amp;M COST SAVINGS</title>
		<link>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/new-plant-improvements-result-in-substantial-om-cost-savings</link>
		<comments>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/new-plant-improvements-result-in-substantial-om-cost-savings#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 16:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[<50K]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Water Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Improved Treatment Plant Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[O&M Cost Savings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plant Improvement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sustainabilityarchive.com/?p=761</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Hangtown Creek Water Reclamation Facility (HCWRF) is located in the Sierra Nevada foothills of Northern California. The treatment plant capacity is 101 L/s (2.3 mgd) average dry weather flow. Substantial improvements were required to comply with new waste discharge requirements (including nutrient removal, year-round tertiary treatment, reduction of disinfection byproducts, and effluent cooling) and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Hangtown Creek Water Reclamation Facility (HCWRF) is located in the Sierra Nevada<br />
foothills of Northern California. The treatment plant capacity is 101 L/s (2.3 mgd) average dry<br />
weather flow. Substantial improvements were required to comply with new waste discharge<br />
requirements (including nutrient removal, year-round tertiary treatment, reduction of disinfection<br />
byproducts, and effluent cooling) and a cease and desist order, sludge treatment regulations, to<br />
address safety issues. A substantial increase in annual operation and maintenance (O&amp;M) cost<br />
was probable with the addition of the upgraded treatment processes and need to meet more<br />
stringent effluent limits.<br />
The design strategy included upgrading critical processes and replacing inefficient outdated<br />
technology to improve treatment plant efficiency while mitigating increases in overall operation<br />
O&amp;M cost. Since the City service area is of limited size and the number of connections is not<br />
growing, controlling O&amp;M costs was a major concern of the City.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/new-plant-improvements-result-in-substantial-om-cost-savings/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Converting Residuals To Reuse: Taking Aeration Out Of Oxidation</title>
		<link>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/converting-residuals-to-reuse-taking-aeration-out-of-oxidation</link>
		<comments>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/converting-residuals-to-reuse-taking-aeration-out-of-oxidation#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 16:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[<50K]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sanitary Sewer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stormwater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cost Savings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decreased Aeration Demand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decreased Energy Consumption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plant Sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smaller Carbon Footprint]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sustainabilityarchive.com/?p=779</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Aeration accounts for up to 60% of the total energy required for a typical activated sludge wastewater plant. A new process was developed that decreases aeration demand during secondary wastewater treatment. This process, called BIOBROx, blends oxidant-laden residuals with screened municipal wastewater followed by treatment in a fixed-bed (FXB) bioreactor. Pilot testing showed that the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aeration accounts for up to 60% of the total energy required for a typical activated sludge wastewater plant. A new process was developed that decreases aeration demand during secondary wastewater treatment. This process, called BIOBROx, blends oxidant-laden residuals with screened municipal wastewater followed by treatment in a fixed-bed (FXB) bioreactor. Pilot testing showed that the BIOBROx process was effective at removing perchlorate and nitrate from membrane residuals. Considerable biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) and suspended solids were also removed across the process. A 3.8-mgd BIOBROx demonstration facility is now operating at the Magna Water District. The BIOBROx train treats 1/3 to 1/2 of Magna’s total wastewater flow, uses no aeration, has an empty-bed contact time of 10 minutes, and has a footprint that is one-twentieth the size of the conventional secondary processes. Preliminary data show effluent that even under these conditions, BOD5 and TSS levels in the effluent from the BIOBROx process are similar to those in Magna’s conventional secondary treatment effluent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/converting-residuals-to-reuse-taking-aeration-out-of-oxidation/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CSO Control, Treatment and Disinfection at Saco Wastewater Treatment Plant using Advanced Vortex Technologies</title>
		<link>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/cso-control-treatment-and-disinfection-at-saco-wastewater-treatment-plant-using-advanced-vortex-technologies</link>
		<comments>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/cso-control-treatment-and-disinfection-at-saco-wastewater-treatment-plant-using-advanced-vortex-technologies#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 16:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[<50K]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stormwater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Water Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cost Savings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Improved Disinfection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Improved Plant Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Improved Solids Removal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Optimal CSO Control]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sustainabilityarchive.com/?p=799</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The use of novel CSO control, treatment and disinfection systems based on advanced vortex technologies including Vortex Flow Controls (VFC) and Hydrodynamic Vortex Separator (HDVS) that enable, Screening, Grit Removal, Sedimentation and Disinfection to be accomplished in one vessel is described. The application of the technologies at the Saco Wastewater Treatment Plant involves a new [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The use of novel CSO control, treatment and disinfection systems based on advanced vortex technologies<br />
including Vortex Flow Controls (VFC) and Hydrodynamic Vortex Separator (HDVS) that enable,<br />
Screening, Grit Removal, Sedimentation and Disinfection to be accomplished in one vessel is described.<br />
The application of the technologies at the Saco Wastewater Treatment Plant involves a new generation of<br />
HDVS and vortex flow controls that regulate wet-weather flows to control maximum flows to the existing<br />
wastewater treatment plant to avoid hydraulic overloading and the diversion of excess combined sewage<br />
flows to the new CSO treatment facility.<br />
The wet-weather treatment facility utilizes an advanced HDVS that incorporates a non-powered, selfactivating<br />
and self-cleansing CSO floatables screening system; with the captured pollutants comprising<br />
sewer debris and solids including sediments, settleable organic solids and floatables, being returned to the<br />
headworks at the treatment plant and the clarified, screened and disinfected overflow being discharged to<br />
the receiving environment (Saco River), after de-chlorination.<br />
The ability to perform several essential unit processes (i.e. Screening, Grit Removal, Sedimentation and<br />
Disinfection) all in one vessel resulted in significant savings in the overall project scheme costs on<br />
account of the more compact design of the advanced HDVS system coupled with the elimination of<br />
additional tanks and vessels that would have been required with the conventional approach. Analytical<br />
results from post-construction compliance monitoring have confirmed the efficacy of the advanced vortex<br />
technologies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/cso-control-treatment-and-disinfection-at-saco-wastewater-treatment-plant-using-advanced-vortex-technologies/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Improving Nutrient Removal While Reducing Carbon Footprint at Three Swiss WWTPs Thanks to Advanced Control</title>
		<link>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/improving-nutrient-removal-while-reducing-carbon-footprint-at-three-swiss-wwtps-thanks-to-advanced-control</link>
		<comments>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/improving-nutrient-removal-while-reducing-carbon-footprint-at-three-swiss-wwtps-thanks-to-advanced-control#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 16:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[<50K]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[100K-500K]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[500K-1M]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Water Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ammonia Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cost Savings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Savings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Impact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plant Sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reduced Aeration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reduced Carbon Footprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reduced Greenhouse Gas Emissions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sustainabilityarchive.com/?p=829</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Aeration consumes about 60% of the total energy of a WWTP and therefore makes up for a major part of its carbon footprint. Introducing advanced process control can help plants to reduce their carbon footprint and at the same time improve effluent quality through making available unused capacity for denitrification, if the ammonia concentration is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aeration consumes about 60% of the total energy of a WWTP and therefore makes up for a<br />
major part of its carbon footprint. Introducing advanced process control can help plants to reduce<br />
their carbon footprint and at the same time improve effluent quality through making available<br />
unused capacity for denitrification, if the ammonia concentration is below a certain set-point.<br />
Measuring and control concepts are a cost-saving alternative to the extension of reactor volume.<br />
However, they also involve the risk of violation of the effluent limits due to measuring errors,<br />
unsuitable control concepts or inadequate implementation of the measuring and control system.<br />
Dynamic simulation is a suitable tool to analyze the plant and to design tailored measuring and<br />
control systems.<br />
During this work, extensive data collection, modeling and full-scale implementation of aeration<br />
control algorithms were carried out at three conventional activated sludge plants with fixed predenitrification<br />
and nitrification reactor zones. Full-scale energy savings in the range of 16-20 %<br />
could be achieved together with an increase of total nitrogen removal of 40%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/improving-nutrient-removal-while-reducing-carbon-footprint-at-three-swiss-wwtps-thanks-to-advanced-control/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Removal of Emerging Contaminants to Obtain Aquifer Recharge Credits in Broward County: Compliance with the Future Regulatory Provisions</title>
		<link>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/removal-of-emerging-contaminants-to-obtain-aquifer-recharge-credits-in-broward-county-compliance-with-the-future-regulatory-provisions</link>
		<comments>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/removal-of-emerging-contaminants-to-obtain-aquifer-recharge-credits-in-broward-county-compliance-with-the-future-regulatory-provisions#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 16:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[<50K]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Water Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advanced Wastewater Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aquifer Recharge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) Removal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Improved Public Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulatory Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water Reuse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sustainabilityarchive.com/?p=928</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Town of Davie, FL, is evaluating the feasibility of an upgrade its System II Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) with tertiary treatment to promote indirect potable reuse and obtain aquifer recharge credit in Broward County. Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) requires the evaluation and piloting of any advanced treatment technologies that plan to engage [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Town of Davie, FL, is evaluating the feasibility of an upgrade its System II Wastewater<br />
Treatment Plant (WWTP) with tertiary treatment to promote indirect potable reuse and obtain<br />
aquifer recharge credit in Broward County. Florida Department of Environmental Protection<br />
(FDEP) requires the evaluation and piloting of any advanced treatment technologies that plan to<br />
engage direct recharge to the Biscayne Aquifer. Chapter 62-610, Part V, F.A.C mandates the<br />
evaluation of such technologies via a pilot study to show the compliance of the reclaimed water<br />
with groundwater recharge standards.<br />
AECOM is currently conducting an advanced treatment pilot study for the Town consisting of<br />
Ultrafiltration (UF), Reverse Osmosis (RO) and Ultraviolet Light/Hydrogen Peroxide (UV/H2O2)<br />
processes. This study is intended to evaluate the feasibility of this process for compliance with<br />
the FDEP and Broward County Environmental Protection Department (BCEPD) regulations for<br />
direct recharge to the Biscayne Aquifer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/removal-of-emerging-contaminants-to-obtain-aquifer-recharge-credits-in-broward-county-compliance-with-the-future-regulatory-provisions/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Saving Millions through Resurrecting the Decommissioned Taber WWTP using an Innovative Design-Build Approach</title>
		<link>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/saving-millions-through-resurrecting-the-decommissioned-taber-wwtp-using-an-innovative-design-build-approach</link>
		<comments>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/saving-millions-through-resurrecting-the-decommissioned-taber-wwtp-using-an-innovative-design-build-approach#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 16:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[<50K]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Water Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Construction Savings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cost Effective Plant Upgrade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maximized Existing Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plant Optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plant Sustainability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sustainabilityarchive.com/?p=933</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The upgraded Taber Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) is located in Southern Alberta and treats the domestic wastewater from the Town of Taber (Town). The plant formerly consisted of two (2) rotating biological contactors (RBCs) and two (2) secondary clarifiers. Due to operational issues with the RBCs and available capacity in the industrial system, the domestic [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The upgraded Taber Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) is located in Southern Alberta and<br />
treats the domestic wastewater from the Town of Taber (Town). The plant formerly consisted of<br />
two (2) rotating biological contactors (RBCs) and two (2) secondary clarifiers. Due to<br />
operational issues with the RBCs and available capacity in the industrial system, the domestic<br />
wastewater system was decommissioned in 2000 and all of the domestic sewage was diverted to<br />
the aerated lagoons for co-treatment with the industrial wastewater. The coarse manual bar<br />
screen at the WWTP remained operational during the time that the WWTP was not in service.<br />
In 2006, Stantec Consulting Ltd. (Stantec) teamed up with Lockerbie Stanley Inc. (Lockerbie)<br />
and EPCOR Alberta Inc. (EPCOR) to upgrade and expand the decommissioned Taber WWTP by<br />
implementing biological nutrient removal (BNR) through a Design-Build-Operate-Finance<br />
(DBOF) delivery process. The project was completed for $ 15 million compared to the original<br />
estimate of $ 28 million. The project presented several challenges including the reuse of<br />
decommissioned infrastructure and extremely tight hydraulics while providing a process train<br />
that met the future growth requirements of the Town and the Alberta Environment effluent<br />
quality standards. The construction of the project started in November 2007 and the plant was<br />
commissioned in early 2009. This paper outlines how the existing WWTP infrastructure has<br />
been reused and provides information on the challenges associated with the design, construction<br />
and commissioning of the WWTP along with recent plant performance data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/saving-millions-through-resurrecting-the-decommissioned-taber-wwtp-using-an-innovative-design-build-approach/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lake Concord Stormwater Park &#8211; A Water Quality BMP Showcase</title>
		<link>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/lake-concord-stormwater-park-a-water-quality-bmp-showcase</link>
		<comments>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/lake-concord-stormwater-park-a-water-quality-bmp-showcase#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 16:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[<50K]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stormwater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Educational Attraction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Impact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Improved Customer Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Low Impact Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neighborhood Improvement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pervious Pavement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stormwater Best Management Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stormwater Reuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wetland Restoration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sustainabilityarchive.com/?p=961</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Lake Concord Stormwater Park project is located in the urban core of the city of Casselberry. Part of Casselberry&#8217;s “City Center” concept, the park is a combination of urban community redevelopment and stormwater/water quality retrofits with an educational component. The park showcases multiple stormwater best management practices (BMPs), including detention, exfiltration, baffle boxes, pervious [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Lake Concord Stormwater Park project is located in the urban core of the city of<br />
Casselberry. Part of Casselberry&#8217;s “City Center” concept, the park is a combination of urban<br />
community redevelopment and stormwater/water quality retrofits with an educational<br />
component. The park showcases multiple stormwater best management practices (BMPs),<br />
including detention, exfiltration, baffle boxes, pervious pavement, bioretention, environmental<br />
swales, stormwater reuse, native and water efficient plantings, and wetland restoration through<br />
shoreline and littoral revegetation. Educational signage within the park describes each BMP<br />
employed, and also provides visitors with information on broad watershed/water quality issues<br />
and practical BMPs they can use in their own backyards. Because the park is a redevelopment<br />
project within a highly urbanized area, its design and construction posed several challenges and<br />
resulted in several lessons learned that can be applied to redevelopment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/lake-concord-stormwater-park-a-water-quality-bmp-showcase/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Green Roof Technology as a Stormwater Best Management Practice</title>
		<link>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/green-roof-technology-as-a-stormwater-best-management-practice</link>
		<comments>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/green-roof-technology-as-a-stormwater-best-management-practice#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 15:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[>1M]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[<50K]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[100K-500K]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[500K-1M]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[50k-100k]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stormwater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Water Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best Practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Impact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Improved Water Quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lowered Absorbed Radiant Heat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reduced Carbon Footprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reduced Flooding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reduced Raw Spillage Leaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reduced Runoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sewer Overflow Control]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sustainabilityarchive.com/?p=1042</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many older cities have antiquated sewer systems that are unable to accommodate increasing amounts of impervious surface runoff from urban expansion. Excess stormwater runoff often causes systems to become overwhelmed resulting in untreated raw sewage spills into lakes, streams, and rivers. Installation of green roofs addresses this problem by using plants to cover the roofs [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many older cities have antiquated sewer systems that are unable to accommodate increasing<br />
amounts of impervious surface runoff from urban expansion. Excess stormwater runoff often<br />
causes systems to become overwhelmed resulting in untreated raw sewage spills into lakes,<br />
streams, and rivers.<br />
Installation of green roofs addresses this problem by using plants to cover the roofs of buildings;<br />
providing runoff control as well as lowering the amount of radiant heat absorbed by the roof.<br />
Green layered roofing systems absorb water that otherwise would have become runoff and<br />
entered the sewer system, reduce runoff flow rates, delay peak flows and, possibly, improve the<br />
water quality of runoff. Quantitative information is presented on the long term performance of<br />
two different green roof technologies in terms of initial runoff retardation, maximum peak flow<br />
retardation, and quantity of flow as compared to companion control roofs located in the<br />
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania area.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/green-roof-technology-as-a-stormwater-best-management-practice/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Remarkable Turnarounds in Good Times and Bad: Engaged Workforce Leads a Change from Good to Great!</title>
		<link>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/remarkable-turnarounds-in-good-times-and-bad-engaged-workforce-leads-a-change-from-good-to-great</link>
		<comments>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/remarkable-turnarounds-in-good-times-and-bad-engaged-workforce-leads-a-change-from-good-to-great#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 15:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[<50K]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stormwater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Water Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cost Effective Operation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cross-Training]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Improved Customer Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Improved Employee Morale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Improved Team Work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Improved Utility Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Optimized Plant Operation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plant Optimization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sustainabilityarchive.com/?p=1046</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Through a process of management changes, employee engagement and adopting a performance culture, a small utility transformed itself from near financial ruin to a utility known nationwide as one of the best small companies to work for in America. By following the simple steps outlined in this article, Utilities across the country can follow this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Through a process of management changes, employee engagement and adopting a performance<br />
culture, a small utility transformed itself from near financial ruin to a utility known nationwide as<br />
one of the best small companies to work for in America. By following the simple steps outlined<br />
in this article, Utilities across the country can follow this model to build their own winning<br />
workplace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/remarkable-turnarounds-in-good-times-and-bad-engaged-workforce-leads-a-change-from-good-to-great/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OVERCOMING CHALLENGES ASSOCIATED WITH IMPLEMENTING ODOR CONTROL IMPROVEMENTS – A CASE STUDY</title>
		<link>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/overcoming-challenges-associated-with-implementing-odor-control-improvements-%e2%80%93-a-case-study</link>
		<comments>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/overcoming-challenges-associated-with-implementing-odor-control-improvements-%e2%80%93-a-case-study#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 20:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[<50K]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Water Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biotechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cost Savings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effectively Dealing with Odor Control Challenges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Improved Customer Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reduced Hydrogen Sulfide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reduced Odors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sustainabilityarchive.com/?p=575</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 1.8 MGD (ADWF) Sausalito-Marin City Sanitary District (SMCSD) wastewater treatment plant is situated on a small (approximately 2.5-acre), constrained site on the San Francisco Bay. The plant has numerous odor sources that impact nearby residents and cause odor complaints. Spray masking agents installed in 2003 and liquid phase treatment systems have been marginally effective [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 1.8 MGD (ADWF) Sausalito-Marin City Sanitary District (SMCSD) wastewater treatment<br />
plant is situated on a small (approximately 2.5-acre), constrained site on the San Francisco Bay.<br />
The plant has numerous odor sources that impact nearby residents and cause odor complaints.<br />
Spray masking agents installed in 2003 and liquid phase treatment systems have been marginally<br />
effective in controlling offsite odors. Customer surveys determined that odor control from the 50<br />
year-old treatment plant was an important community goal and SMCSD Board of Directors<br />
authorized funding and implementation of state of the art odor control measures.<br />
An odor study was completed in 2004 that identified the major odor sources at the plant and<br />
made recommendations for odor control improvements. The SMCSD initiated an odor control<br />
improvements project immediately thereafter for addressing and controlling plant fugitive odor<br />
emissions. The initial concept design phase selected biotechnology as the preferred odor control<br />
technology based primarily on performance, safety, and ease of operation.<br />
During the detailed design phase several significant challenges surfaced, including the extremely<br />
limited footprint available at the site for new odor control facilities. This challenge was met by<br />
selecting small footprint bioscrubbers that would be installed on the roof of an existing control<br />
building. This decision triggered a seismic analysis of the existing control building (constructed<br />
in 1981), since local seismic criteria had since changed significantly since it was constructed.<br />
Structural roof improvements were implemented, coupled with the selection of multiple lightweight<br />
bioscrubbers (to spread the load). Roof weight limitation, equipment comparative<br />
performance assessment, and schedule issues drove the project to procure the bioscrubbers via a<br />
sole-source arrangement. Ongoing plant improvements that were impacting detailed odor control<br />
design had to be carefully coordinated.<br />
Two major design changes produced a significant cost savings for the project. First, a decision<br />
was made to reduce the primary clarifier cover to a launder-only cover. This accomplished a<br />
desire of plant staff to minimize confined spaces (for ease of maintenance and renewal and<br />
replacement efforts). In addition, there was an expected benefit that planned ferric chloride<br />
addition to plant influent would have on both primary clarifier performance and reduction of<br />
hydrogen sulfide (H2S) related odors. Second, the design team reversed the fixed film reactor air<br />
flow (air flow was changed to a vertical downward direction)_in order to delete the requirement<br />
for a fixed film reactor cover from the project (the downward flow pattern was expected to<br />
reduce fugitive emissions from the open top). These cover cost savings alone were realized at<br />
over $300,000 for the overall $1.5 million dollar project.<br />
During the construction phase of this project additional challenges surfaced, including an<br />
accelerated deteriorating vehicle access causeway that required the contractor to adjust<br />
construction work approaches. In addition, due to limitations related to access at the plant, an<br />
ocean barge and crane was used via San Francisco Bay to hoist the bioscrubber equipment onto<br />
the roof of the existing control building. Finally, more stringent plant effluent permit<br />
requirements imposed by the local water board required that treated plant effluent, designed to be<br />
utilized for bioscrubber irrigation, be chlorinated to greater than 5 parts per million (ppm) Cl-, a<br />
level exceeding that recommended by the bioscrubber manufacturer. This required that a<br />
separate non-chlorinated pumped irrigation system (secondary effluent) be implemented as both<br />
an irrigation and nutrient source.<br />
The various challenges encountered during implementation of the odor control improvements at<br />
the SMCSD were met with ingenuity, creativity and perseverance by both plant staff and the<br />
engineering consultant. This allowed the project to move forward, meeting both schedule and<br />
budget constraints, and accomplish the project goal of mitigating offsite odors while building<br />
community trust and demonstrating that SMCSD is acting as a good neighbor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sustainabilityarchive.com/overcoming-challenges-associated-with-implementing-odor-control-improvements-%e2%80%93-a-case-study/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

